1. Supply and Demand

1.1 Price Elasticity of Demand

1.1.1 Total revenue test

1.1.2 Elastic, inelastic and unit elastic demand

1.1.3 Determinants of price elasticity: Substitutability, proportion of income

1.2 Price Elasticity of Supply

1.2.1 Factors influencing elasticity: Availability of inputs, production time

1.2.2 Comparison of short-run and long-run elasticity

1.3 Other Elasticities

1.3.1 Cross-price elasticity: Substitutes and complements

1.3.2 Income elasticity: Normal and inferior goods

1.4 Market Equilibrium and Consumer and Producer Surplus

1.4.1 Equilibrium price and quantity determination

1.4.2 Calculating consumer and producer surplus

1.4.3 Welfare economics: Maximizing total surplus

1.5 Market Disequilibrium and Changes in Equilibrium

1.5.1 Effects of shifts in supply and demand

1.5.2 Price floors (e.g. minimum wage) and price ceilings (e.g. rent control)

1.6 Effects of Government Intervention in Markets

1.6.1 Taxes: Impact on consumers, producers and deadweight loss

1.6.2 Subsidies: Benefits and inefficiencies

1.6.3 Quantity controls (e.g. quotas)

1.7 International Trade and Public Policy

1.7.1 Effects of imports and exports on domestic markets

1.7.2 Tariffs and quotas: Costs and benefits

1.7.3 Free trade vs. protectionism

1.8 Demand

1.8.1 Law of demand and reasons for downward slope

1.8.2 Determinants of demand: Income, tastes, prices of related goods

1.8.3 Normal vs. inferior goods

1.9 Supply

1.9.1 Law of supply and reasons for upward slope

1.9.2 Determinants of supply: Input costs, technology, expectations

1.9.3 Short-run vs. long-run adjustments

2. Imperfect Competition

2.1 Oligopoly and Game Theory

2.1.1 Collusion and cartels: Benefits and challenges

2.1.2 Characteristics of oligopolies: Few large firms, barriers to entry

2.1.3 Strategic behavior: Nash equilibrium and dominant strategies

2.2 Introduction to Imperfectly Competitive Markets

2.2.1 Comparison of market structures: Monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition

2.2.2 Causes and implications of market power

2.3 Monopoly

2.3.1 Sources of monopoly power

2.3.2 Price-setting behavior and inefficiency

2.3.3 Graphical representation of monopoly pricing

2.4 Price Discrimination

2.4.1 Conditions for price discrimination

2.4.2 Examples of first, second, and third-degree price discrimination

2.5 Monopolistic Competition

2.5.1 Characteristics: Product differentiation and many sellers

2.5.2 Short-run profit and long-run equilibrium

2.5.3 Excess capacity and inefficiency

3. Factor Markets

3.1 Introduction to Factor Markets

3.1.1 Derived demand: Factors of production

3.1.2 Marginal product of labor (MPL) and capital

3.1.3 Value of marginal product (VMP)

3.2 Changes in Factor Demand and Supply

3.2.1 Determinants of factor demand: Productivity, prices of goods

3.2.2 Determinants of factor supply: Population, preferences

3.3 Profit-Maximizing Behavior in Factor Markets

3.3.1 Marginal revenue product (MRP) = Marginal resource cost (MRC)

3.3.2 Hiring decisions in competitive and imperfect markets

3.4 Monopsonistic Markets

3.4.1 Characteristics of monopsony

3.4.2 Wage determination and inefficiency

4. Market Failure and the Role of Government

4.1 Socially Efficient and Inefficient Market Outcomes

4.1.1 Allocative efficiency: Marginal benefit equals marginal cost

4.1.2 Causes of market failures: Externalities, public goods

4.2 Externalities

4.2.1 Positive externalities: Subsidies and government intervention

4.2.2 Negative externalities: Taxes, regulations, and tradable permits

4.2.3 Graphical analysis of externalities

4.3 Public and Private Goods

4.3.1 Characteristics: Excludability and rivalry

4.3.2 Free-rider problem and under-provision of public goods

4.4 Government Intervention in Different Market Structures

4.4.1 Regulation of monopolies: Price caps and subsidies

4.4.2 Antitrust policies: Promoting competition

4.5 Inequality

4.5.1 Measurement of income inequality: Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient

4.5.2 Causes of inequality: Education, skills, inheritance

4.5.3 Government redistribution policies

5. Production, Cost and the Perfect Competition Model

5.1 The Production Function

5.1.1 Relationship between inputs and outputs

5.1.2 Short-run vs. long-run production

5.1.3 Law of diminishing marginal returns

5.2 Short-Run Production Costs

5.2.1 Fixed variable and total costs

5.2.2 Marginal cost (MC), average total cost (ATC), and average variable cost (AVC)

5.2.3 Cost curves and their relationships

5.3 Long-Run Production Costs

5.3.1 Economies of scale, diseconomies of scale, and constant returns

5.3.2 Long-run average cost curve (LRAC)

5.4 Types of Profit

5.4.1 Accounting profit vs. economic profit

5.4.2 Normal profit and its role in resource allocation

5.5 Profit Maximization

5.5.1 MC = MR rule for maximizing profit

5.5.2 Loss minimization in the short run

5.6 Firms’ Short-Run Decisions

5.6.1 Shutdown decision: Comparing price to AVC

5.6.2 Sunk costs and decision-making

5.7 Perfect Competition

5.7.1 Characteristics of perfect competition

5.7.2 Short-run vs. long-run equilibrium

5.7.3 Efficiency of perfectly competitive markets

6. Basic Economic Concepts

6.1 Scarcity

6.1.1 Definition and examples of scarcity

6.1.2 Unlimited wants vs. limited resources

6.1.3 Implications for individuals and societies

6.2 Resource Allocation and Economic Systems

6.2.1 Types of systems: Command, market and mixed economies

6.2.2 How different systems address fundamental economic questions

6.2.3 Examples of real-world economies

6.3 Production Possibilities Curve (PPC)

6.3.1 Trade-offs and opportunity cost

6.3.2 Efficiency, inefficiency and unattainable points

6.3.3 Economic growth and shifts in the PPC

6.4 Comparative Advantage and Trade

6.4.1 Difference between absolute and comparative advantage

6.4.2 Specialization and mutual gains from trade

6.4.3 Calculation of opportunity costs

6.5 Cost-Benefit Analysis

6.5.1 Rational decision-making using marginal analysis

6.5.2 Marginal benefits vs. marginal costs

6.5.3 Applications to individual and business decisions

6.6 Marginal Analysis and Consumer Choice

6.6.1 Marginal utility and diminishing marginal returns

6.6.2 Optimal allocation of resources

6.6.3 Budget constraints and consumer equilibrium

Wage determination and inefficiency

Topic 2/3

Revision Notes
Flashcards
Past Paper Analysis
Questions
Videos

Your Flashcards are Ready!

15 Flashcards in this deck.

Wage Determination and Inefficiency

Introduction

Understanding wage determination and inefficiency is crucial for analyzing labor markets, especially within monopsonistic frameworks. This topic is pivotal for students preparing for the Collegeboard AP Microeconomics exam, as it elucidates how single buyers of labor influence wages and market outcomes, leading to potential inefficiencies that deviate from competitive equilibria.

Key Concepts

Monopsonistic Market Structure

A monopsonistic market exists when there is only one buyer of labor in the market. Unlike perfect competition, where numerous employers vie for workers, a monopsony gives the single employer significant market power to set wages. This scenario can lead to outcomes where workers receive lower wages and fewer employment opportunities compared to a competitive market.

Wage Determination in Monopsonistic Markets

In a monopsonistic market, the employer faces an upward-sloping labor supply curve, meaning that to hire additional workers, the employer must offer higher wages not just to the new employees but to all existing employees. This creates a situation where the marginal cost of labor ($MC_L$) is greater than the wage ($W$): $$ MC_L > W $$ The monopsonist maximizes profit by hiring workers up to the point where marginal revenue product of labor ($MRP_L$) equals $MC_L$: $$ MRP_L = MC_L $$ Since $MC_L > W$, the equilibrium wage ($W_m$) in a monopsonistic market is lower than the competitive equilibrium wage ($W_c$): $$ W_m < W_c $$ Additionally, the quantity of labor employed ($L_m$) is less than the competitive equilibrium quantity ($L_c$): $$ L_m < L_c $$

Inefficiency in Monopsonistic Markets

Monopsony leads to allocative inefficiency in the labor market. Allocative efficiency occurs when resources are distributed in a way that maximizes total societal welfare. In a competitive market, $W = MRP_L$, ensuring that workers are paid their marginal productivity. However, in a monopsonistic market: $$ W_m < MRP_L $$ This discrepancy implies that workers are underpaid relative to their productivity, resulting in a deadweight loss (DWL). The deadweight loss can be illustrated by the area between the MRP curve and the labor supply curve from $L_m$ to $L_c$: $$ DWL = \frac{1}{2} \times (W_c - W_m) \times (L_c - L_m) $$ This inefficiency represents the lost welfare or surplus that neither the employer nor the employees capture.

Factors Contributing to Monopsony Power

Several factors can grant an employer monopsony power in the labor market:

Geographic Isolation: Employers located in remote areas may face limited competition for labor.
Skill Specificity: Jobs requiring specialized skills can reduce the pool of potential employers for workers.
Employer Branding: Strong brand identities may lead workers to prefer specific employers, reducing labor mobility.
Barriers to Entry: Legal or economic barriers can prevent other firms from entering the market and increasing competition for labor.

Response to Monopsony Power

To mitigate the inefficiencies caused by monopsony power, several strategies can be employed:

Minimum Wage Laws: Setting a wage floor can help increase workers' earnings toward their marginal productivity.
Worker Mobility Enhancement: Facilitating easier movement of labor between employers can increase competition.
Reducing Barriers to Entry: Encouraging new firms to enter the labor market can diminish the monopsonist's power.

Mathematical Representation of Monopsony

To analyze monopsony quantitatively, consider the following equations:

Labor Supply Function: $W = S(L)$
Marginal Cost of Labor: $$ MC_L = S(L) + L \times \frac{dS}{dL} $$
Marginal Revenue Product of Labor: $MRP_L = \frac{dTR}{dL} = P \times \frac{dQ}{dL}$

Graphical Analysis

Graphically, the monopsonist's wage and employment levels can be depicted by the intersection of $MRP_L$ with $MC_L$, determining $L_m$. The corresponding wage $W_m$ is found by projecting vertically to the labor supply curve. The competitive equilibrium $W_c$ and $L_c$ occur where $W = MRP_L$. The deadweight loss is the triangular area between $L_m$ and $L_c$ bounded by $MRP_L$ and $S(L)$.

Real-World Examples

Monopsony behavior can be observed in various real-world markets:

Healthcare Sector: In rural areas, a single hospital may be the primary employer for medical professionals.
Aquaculture: Fish farms located in specific regions may be the sole employers for local fishermen.
Technology Hubs: Dominant tech companies in regions like Silicon Valley can exhibit monopsonistic traits over specialized labor.

Policy Implications

Policymakers must address monopsonistic inefficiencies to enhance labor market outcomes:

Regulation: Implementing policies that promote competition can reduce monopsony power.
Subsidies: Providing subsidies for new entrants can increase market competition.
Education and Training: Enhancing workers' skills can increase their employability across multiple employers, reducing dependence on a single monopsonist.

Elasticity of Labor Supply

The elasticity of labor supply ($E_s$) plays a critical role in monopsony dynamics. A more elastic labor supply implies that workers can easily switch to alternative employers, limiting the monopsonist's ability to lower wages. Conversely, inelastic labor supply increases the monopsonist's market power, exacerbating wage suppression and employment reductions.

Comparative Statics in Monopsony

Analyzing how changes in parameters affect monopsony outcomes:

Increase in MRP: Raising the marginal revenue product shifts the $MRP_L$ curve upward, leading to higher wages and employment.
Rise in Labor Supply: An upward shift in the labor supply curve ($S(L)$) can reduce $MC_L$, resulting in increased employment and higher wages.
Technological Advancements: Innovations that enhance worker productivity can increase $MRP_L$, mitigating monopsonistic effects.

Comparison Table

Aspect	Monopsonistic Market	Competitive Market
Number of Employers	Single buyer of labor	Many employers
Wage Level	Lower than competitive wage ($W_m < W_c$)	Competitive equilibrium wage ($W = W_c$)
Employment Level	Lower than competitive employment ($L_m < L_c$)	Competitive equilibrium employment ($L = L_c$)
Marginal Cost of Labor	$MC_L > W_m$	$MC_L = W = W_c$
Efficiency	Allocatively inefficient (deadweight loss)	Allocatively efficient
Examples	Single employer industries, rural hospitals	Urban retail markets, competitive service sectors

Summary and Key Takeaways

Monopsony occurs when a single employer dominates the labor market.
Wage determination in monopsony leads to lower wages and reduced employment.
Inefficiencies arise due to the disparity between $MRP_L$ and wages.
Policy interventions can mitigate monopsonistic effects and enhance market efficiency.

Examiner Tip

Tips

Remember the acronym MWI: Monopsony leads to Wage suppression and Inefficiency. Use graphs to visualize the relationship between $MRP_L$, $MC_L$, and the labor supply curve. Practice drawing deadweight loss triangles to reinforce the concept of allocative inefficiency.

Did You Know

Monopsony power isn't limited to traditional labor markets; it can also appear in online gig economies where platforms like Uberact as sole employers for drivers. Additionally, historical examples include company towns, where a single firm provided most jobs, significantly influencing local wage structures and economic conditions.

Common Mistakes

Incorrect: Assuming $W_m = MRP_L$ in monopsony.
Correct: Recognizing that $W_m < MRP_L$ due to monopsony power.

Incorrect: Believing that increasing the number of workers always increases the total wage.
Correct: Understanding that in monopsony, hiring additional workers requires raising wages for all, but employment is still lower than competitive levels.

FAQ

What is a monopsonistic market?

A monopsonistic market is one where there is only one buyer of labor, giving the employer significant power to set wages below competitive levels.

How does a monopsony affect wages?

In a monopsony, the single employer can set wages lower than the competitive equilibrium, leading to lower earnings for workers.

Why is employment lower in a monopsonistic market?

Because the monopsonist hires workers up to the point where $MRP_L = MC_L$, which is fewer than the number hired in a competitive market where $W = MRP_L$.

What causes a monopsony to create deadweight loss?

The deadweight loss arises because the monopsonist's lower wages and reduced employment lead to underutilization of labor relative to the socially optimal level.

How can policies address monopsonistic inefficiencies?

Policies such as minimum wage laws, promoting worker mobility, and reducing barriers to entry can help counteract monopsony power and improve market outcomes.