Topic 2/3
Phylogeny and Taxonomy
Introduction
Key Concepts
1. Definitions and Importance
Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. It illustrates how species have diverged from common ancestors over time, forming a branching pattern known as a phylogenetic tree. Understanding phylogeny allows biologists to trace the lineage of organisms, revealing the processes of speciation and adaptation that have shaped biodiversity.
Taxonomy, on the other hand, is the science of naming, defining, and classifying organisms into groups based on shared characteristics. It provides a structured framework for organizing biological diversity, facilitating communication and study across different regions and languages. Taxonomy encompasses hierarchical categories such as domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species.
Both phylogeny and taxonomy are crucial for several reasons:
- Organization of Biological Diversity: They provide a systematic method to categorize and understand the immense variety of life forms.
- Evolutionary Insights: Phylogenetic studies reveal the evolutionary pathways and relationships among organisms, highlighting patterns of descent and diversification.
- Conservation Efforts: Accurate classification aids in identifying species at risk and implementing effective conservation strategies.
- Medical and Agricultural Applications: Understanding the relationships among organisms can lead to advancements in medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology.
2. Historical Development of Taxonomy and Phylogeny
The roots of taxonomy can be traced back to Carl Linnaeus in the 18th century, who developed the binomial nomenclature system used today to name species. Linnaeus's hierarchical classification system, which includes ranks such as genus and species, laid the foundation for modern taxonomy. His work emphasized the importance of standardized naming conventions and classification based on morphological characteristics.
Phylogeny, as a concept, evolved significantly with the advent of evolutionary biology. Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection provided a mechanism for evolution, prompting the scientific community to explore the evolutionary relationships among organisms. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, scientists like Ernst Haeckel began constructing phylogenetic trees to represent these relationships visually.
The integration of molecular biology in the late 20th century revolutionized both taxonomy and phylogeny. DNA sequencing and genetic analysis enabled more precise determination of evolutionary relationships, leading to the development of molecular phylogenetics. This shift from morphology-based to genetics-based classification has refined our understanding of the tree of life, revealing previously unrecognized relationships and prompting reclassification of many organisms.
3. Hierarchical Classification System
Taxonomy employs a hierarchical system to classify living organisms. The primary ranks in this hierarchy, from highest to lowest, are:
- Domain: The highest taxonomic rank, grouping organisms based on fundamental cellular differences. The three domains are Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya.
- Kingdom: The next level, categorizing organisms within each domain. For example, the Kingdom Animalia includes all animals.
- Phylum: Groups organisms within a kingdom based on major body plans or organizational structures. For instance, Chordata is a phylum that includes animals with a notochord.
- Class: Divides phyla into classes based on more specific similarities. Mammalia, for example, is a class within the phylum Chordata.
- Order: Further categorizes classes into orders. Primates is an order within the class Mammalia.
- Family: Groups related genera within an order. Hominidae is a family within the order Primates.
- Genus: A group of closely related species. Homo is the genus that includes modern humans.
- Species: The most specific rank, identifying individual organisms capable of interbreeding. Homo sapiens is the species name for humans.
This hierarchical structure allows for the organized classification of organisms, reflecting both evolutionary relationships and morphological similarities.
4. Phylogenetic Trees
A phylogenetic tree is a diagram that represents the evolutionary relationships among various species or groups. The branching pattern of the tree indicates how species have diverged from common ancestors over time.
Key components of a phylogenetic tree include:
- Nodes: Points where branches split, representing common ancestors.
- Branches: Lines connecting nodes, indicating evolutionary pathways.
- Tips: The endpoints of branches, representing current species or taxa.
There are different types of phylogenetic trees, including:
- Cladograms: Tree diagrams that show the branching order and relationships without indicating the time scale.
- Phylograms: Trees that incorporate branch lengths proportional to the amount of evolutionary change.
- Chronograms: Trees with branch lengths proportional to time, showing the timing of evolutionary events.
Constructing phylogenetic trees involves various methods, such as morphological analysis, molecular sequencing, and computational algorithms that analyze genetic data to infer evolutionary relationships accurately.
5. Molecular Phylogenetics
Molecular phylogenetics uses DNA, RNA, and protein sequences to determine evolutionary relationships among organisms. This approach offers several advantages over traditional morphology-based methods:
- Higher Resolution: Molecular data can resolve relationships at finer taxonomic levels, distinguishing closely related species.
- Objectivity: Genetic data provide a quantifiable basis for inferring relationships, reducing subjective interpretations inherent in morphological analysis.
- Evolutionary Markers: Specific genetic sequences can act as markers for tracing lineage and detecting evolutionary events such as gene duplications and horizontal gene transfer.
Techniques in molecular phylogenetics include:
- DNA Sequencing: Determining the nucleotide order of DNA segments to compare genetic similarities and differences.
- RNA Analysis: Examining RNA sequences, particularly useful for studying gene expression and function in evolutionary contexts.
- Protein Sequencing: Analyzing amino acid sequences of proteins to infer evolutionary relationships based on protein structure similarities.
Computational tools and algorithms, such as Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference, are employed to construct accurate phylogenetic trees from molecular data, facilitating a deeper understanding of the evolutionary history of life on Earth.
6. Cladistics
Cladistics is a method of classification that groups organisms based on shared derived characteristics (synapomorphies) that are inherited from a common ancestor. This approach emphasizes the branching patterns of evolution, aiming to establish clades—monophyletic groups consisting of an ancestor and all its descendants.
Key principles of cladistics include:
- Monophyly: Ensuring that each clade includes all descendants of a common ancestor, maintaining evolutionary integrity.
- Sister Groups: Identifying the closest relatives of a given clade, which share an immediate common ancestor.
- Outgroups: Species or groups outside the clade of interest, used to root the phylogenetic tree and infer ancestral traits.
Cladistic analysis involves:
- Character Coding: Identifying and coding morphological or molecular characteristics to identify synapomorphies.
- Tree Construction: Using algorithms to arrange clades based on shared derived characteristics, producing a cladogram that reflects evolutionary relationships.
Cladistics has revolutionized taxonomy by promoting a more objective and evolutionary-based classification system, moving away from traditional Linnaean taxonomy which often relied on subjective or superficial traits.
7. Linnaean vs. Phylogenetic Classification
Traditional Linnaean classification organizes organisms into hierarchical categories based primarily on morphological similarities and differences. While effective for organizing known species, it does not necessarily reflect evolutionary relationships and can sometimes result in polyphyletic or paraphyletic groups.
In contrast, phylogenetic classification aims to group organisms based on shared evolutionary ancestry, striving for monophyletic clades that accurately depict natural relationships. This method leverages molecular data and cladistic principles to provide a more accurate and dynamic understanding of biodiversity.
Key differences include:
- Basis of Classification: Linnaean relies on morphological traits, while phylogenetic uses genetic and evolutionary data.
- Groupings: Linnaean can create groups based on convenience or tradition, potentially ignoring evolutionary lineage. Phylogenetic seeks to ensure that all groups represent true evolutionary branches.
- Flexibility: Phylogenetic classification is more adaptable to new discoveries and data, allowing for continual refinement of relationships as new information emerges.
Despite these differences, both classification systems are complementary. Linnaean taxonomy provides a foundational framework, while phylogenetic insights continuously refine and enhance our understanding of biological relationships.
8. Evolutionary Principles in Phylogeny and Taxonomy
Understanding phylogeny and taxonomy requires a solid grasp of evolutionary principles, as evolution underpins the relationships and classifications we observe in biology.
Key evolutionary concepts include:
- Common Descent: The principle that all living organisms share a common ancestor, forming a single tree of life.
- Speciation: The process by which new species arise from existing ones, contributing to biodiversity and the branching patterns seen in phylogenetic trees.
- Adaptive Radiation: The diversification of a group of organisms into forms filling different ecological niches, leading to a burst of speciation and increased diversity.
- Convergent and Divergent Evolution: Convergent evolution results in unrelated species developing similar traits due to similar environmental pressures, while divergent evolution leads to related species developing distinct traits due to different selective pressures.
These principles guide the construction and interpretation of phylogenetic trees, ensuring that classifications accurately reflect the evolutionary history of organisms.
9. Practical Applications of Phylogeny and Taxonomy
Phylogeny and taxonomy have wide-ranging applications across various scientific and practical fields, including:
- Conservation Biology: Identifying evolutionary distinct species helps prioritize conservation efforts, protecting biodiversity hotspots and preventing extinctions.
- Medicine: Understanding the phylogenetic relationships among pathogens can inform vaccine development and disease management strategies.
- Agriculture: Taxonomic classification assists in the identification and breeding of crop species, enhancing agricultural productivity and resilience.
- Environmental Science: Assessing ecosystem health involves cataloging species diversity and understanding the roles of different organisms within ecosystems.
- Biotechnology: Phylogenetic insights can guide the discovery of new enzymes, proteins, and other biomolecules with industrial or therapeutic applications.
These applications demonstrate the practical significance of phylogeny and taxonomy, highlighting their role in addressing real-world challenges and advancing scientific knowledge.
10. Challenges in Phylogeny and Taxonomy
Despite their importance, phylogeny and taxonomy face several challenges that can complicate classification efforts:
- Incomplete Fossil Record: Gaps in the fossil record can obscure the true evolutionary relationships among extinct and extant species.
- Horizontal Gene Transfer: The exchange of genetic material between unrelated organisms, particularly in prokaryotes, can confound phylogenetic analyses based on genetic data.
- Cryptic Species: Morphologically similar but genetically distinct species can be difficult to differentiate using traditional taxonomic methods.
- Convergent Evolution: Similar morphological traits arising independently in unrelated groups can lead to misclassification if not accounted for in phylogenetic analysis.
- Subjectivity in Character Selection: Choosing which traits to use for classification can introduce bias, affecting the resulting phylogenetic tree.
Addressing these challenges requires integrating multiple lines of evidence, employing advanced molecular techniques, and continually refining classification methodologies to enhance accuracy and reliability.
Advanced Concepts
1. Molecular Clock Hypothesis
The molecular clock hypothesis posits that genetic mutations accumulate at a relatively constant rate over time, allowing for the estimation of divergence times between species based on genetic differences. This concept is fundamental in molecular phylogenetics for constructing accurate phylogenetic trees and unraveling the timing of evolutionary events.
Key aspects of the molecular clock include:
- Mutation Rate: The rate at which genetic mutations occur, which can be influenced by factors such as generation time, metabolic rate, and environmental pressures.
- Calibration Points: Fossil records or geological events used to calibrate the molecular clock, providing a temporal framework for evolutionary timelines.
- Rate Variation: Acknowledging that mutation rates may not be constant across all lineages or genetic loci, requiring statistical models to account for rate heterogeneity.
Applications of the molecular clock include:
- Estimating Divergence Times: Calculating when two species last shared a common ancestor based on genetic divergence.
- Reconstructing Evolutionary History: Building comprehensive timelines of evolutionary events, such as mass extinctions and radiations.
Mathematically, the molecular clock can be represented by the equation:
$$ T = \frac{D}{2r} $$where:
- T: Time since divergence
- D: Genetic distance (number of genetic differences)
- r: Mutation rate per generation
This equation allows biologists to estimate the age of speciation events by analyzing genetic data in conjunction with known mutation rates.
2. Phylogenomics
Phylogenomics is the intersection of phylogenetics and genomics, leveraging whole-genome data to elucidate evolutionary relationships with unprecedented resolution. This approach utilizes comprehensive genetic information to construct highly accurate phylogenetic trees, overcoming limitations of analyses based on single or few genetic markers.
Advantages of phylogenomics include:
- Increased Data Volume: Whole-genome sequences provide a vast amount of data, enhancing the statistical power and accuracy of phylogenetic inferences.
- Resolution of Complex Relationships: Phylogenomics can resolve deep and shallow evolutionary divergences that are challenging to address with limited genetic data.
- Detection of Hybridization and Horizontal Gene Transfer: Comprehensive genomic data can identify instances of genetic exchange between lineages, refining our understanding of evolutionary history.
Challenges in phylogenomics include:
- Computational Complexity: Analyzing large-scale genomic data requires significant computational resources and advanced algorithms.
- Data Quality and Completeness: Incomplete or poor-quality genome sequences can introduce biases and inaccuracies in phylogenetic analyses.
- Reconciliation of Gene Trees and Species Trees: Differences between individual gene trees and the overall species tree necessitate sophisticated methods to integrate diverse data sources.
Phylogenomics represents a cutting-edge frontier in evolutionary biology, offering profound insights into the complexities of life's diversification and the intricate web of genetic relationships among organisms.
3. Cladistic Algorithms and Computational Tools
Cladistic analysis relies heavily on computational algorithms and software tools to process and interpret large datasets, facilitating the construction of accurate phylogenetic trees. Key algorithms and tools include:
- Maximum Parsimony: Seeks the tree that requires the smallest number of evolutionary changes, minimizing the complexity of evolutionary scenarios.
- Maximum Likelihood: Evaluates the probability of observed data given a particular tree structure, selecting the tree with the highest likelihood.
- Bayesian Inference: Incorporates prior probabilities and uses probabilistic models to estimate the posterior distribution of trees, providing a measure of confidence in the results.
- Neighbor-Joining: A distance-based method that builds trees by iteratively clustering taxa based on genetic distance measures.
- Software Tools: Programs such as MEGA, PAUP*, RAxML, and MrBayes are commonly used for phylogenetic analysis, offering functionalities for tree construction, visualization, and statistical evaluation.
These algorithms and tools are integral to modern cladistic analysis, enabling researchers to handle complex and extensive datasets, uncovering nuanced evolutionary relationships that inform our understanding of biological diversity.
4. Integrative Taxonomy
Integrative taxonomy combines multiple lines of evidence—morphological, molecular, ecological, and behavioral data—to achieve a more comprehensive and accurate classification of organisms. This multidisciplinary approach addresses the limitations of single-method taxonomy, enhancing the robustness and reliability of taxonomic conclusions.
Components of integrative taxonomy include:
- Morphological Data: Traditional physical traits used for classification, providing a basis for initial grouping and identification.
- Molecular Data: Genetic information that offers detailed insights into evolutionary relationships and can uncover cryptic species.
- Ecological Data: Information about species' habitats, behaviors, and interactions, contributing to understanding of ecological niches and adaptive strategies.
- Behavioral Data: Insights into species' behaviors, such as mating rituals and social structures, which can inform species distinctions and relationships.
Advantages of integrative taxonomy include:
- Increased Accuracy: Combining multiple data sources reduces the risk of misclassification due to reliance on a single method.
- Detection of Cryptic Diversity: Identifying genetically distinct species that are morphologically similar, enhancing our understanding of biodiversity.
- Comprehensive Understanding: Providing a holistic view of species, encompassing genetic, morphological, ecological, and behavioral dimensions.
Challenges in integrative taxonomy involve data integration, where reconciling conflicting information from different sources can be complex, and the requirement for interdisciplinary expertise to analyze and interpret diverse datasets effectively.
5. Phylogenetic Nomenclature
Phylogenetic nomenclature is a system of naming organisms based on their evolutionary relationships, aligning taxonomic names with the branches of the phylogenetic tree. This approach emphasizes the monophyletic grouping of organisms, ensuring that each taxon represents a clade with a common ancestor and all of its descendants.
Key features of phylogenetic nomenclature include:
- Clade-Based Names: Taxonomic names correspond to specific clades, reflecting accurate evolutionary relationships.
- Descriptive Definitions: Clades are defined by shared derived characteristics, ensuring that names are directly tied to evolutionary history.
- Stability and Flexibility: The system aims to maintain nomenclatural stability while accommodating new evolutionary insights and discoveries.
Advantages over traditional Linnaean taxonomy:
- Evolutionary Accuracy: Names are directly tied to evolutionary relationships, reducing discrepancies between classification and phylogeny.
- Clarity in Relationships: Phylogenetic nomenclature provides clear indications of ancestry and descent, enhancing the interpretability of taxonomic names.
Challenges in phylogenetic nomenclature include the need for consensus within the scientific community, potential disruptions to established naming conventions, and the complexity of integrating new phylogenetic data into existing classification systems.
6. Biogeography and Phylogeny
Biogeography, the study of the distribution of species and ecosystems in geographic space and through geological time, is intimately linked with phylogeny. Phylogenetic relationships provide insights into the historical processes that have shaped the current distribution of organisms, including continental drift, dispersal, vicariance, and adaptive radiation.
Key concepts in biogeography related to phylogeny include:
- Vicariance: The separation of a population due to geographic barriers, leading to divergent evolution and speciation as groups adapt to different environments.
- Dispersal: The movement of organisms from one place to another, facilitating gene flow and influencing species distribution patterns.
- Adaptive Radiation: The rapid diversification of a species into multiple forms adapted to different niches, often occurring in isolated or newly colonized environments.
By integrating phylogenetic data with geographic information, scientists can reconstruct the historical biogeography of lineages, understanding how past events have influenced present-day biodiversity. This integration aids in predicting future distribution changes in response to environmental shifts and anthropogenic factors.
7. Coalescent Theory
Coalescent theory is a retrospective model of population genetics that traces the lineage of alleles back through time to their most recent common ancestor. This framework is essential for understanding genetic diversity, population structure, and the timing of evolutionary events within a phylogenetic context.
Key elements of coalescent theory include:
- Gene Lineages: Tracking the ancestral paths of genes within a population, elucidating how genetic variation is maintained or lost over time.
- Effective Population Size: A concept in coalescent theory that represents the number of individuals contributing genetically to the next generation, influencing the rate of genetic drift and fixation of alleles.
- Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA): Estimating the time elapsed since two alleles last shared a common ancestor, providing insights into population history and divergence times.
Applications of coalescent theory in phylogeny and taxonomy include:
- Demographic Inference: Understanding population sizes and growth rates over time.
- Species Divergence: Estimating the timing and patterns of speciation events.
- Genetic Diversity: Assessing levels of genetic variation within and between populations, informing conservation strategies.
Coalescent theory bridges population genetics and phylogenetics, offering a robust framework for interpreting genetic data within an evolutionary context.
8. Evolutionary Developmental Biology (Evo-Devo) and Phylogeny
Evolutionary developmental biology, or Evo-Devo, explores the developmental processes that drive evolutionary changes in organisms. By investigating how genetic and developmental mechanisms produce morphological diversity, Evo-Devo provides critical insights into the evolutionary basis of phylogenetic relationships.
Key contributions of Evo-Devo to phylogeny include:
- Developmental Constraints: Understanding how developmental pathways limit or facilitate evolutionary changes, influencing the direction and rate of diversification.
- Homologous Genes: Identifying genes involved in development that are conserved across different lineages, shedding light on shared evolutionary histories.
- Phenotypic Integration: Examining how changes in developmental processes lead to coordinated morphological changes, affecting phylogenetic interpretations.
Examples of Evo-Devo impact on phylogeny:
- Modular Development: Insights into modularity—semi-independent units of development—reveal how organisms can evolve certain traits without affecting others, facilitating diversification.
- Gene Regulatory Networks: Mapping the interactions of genes during development helps delineate evolutionary relationships based on shared genetic regulatory mechanisms.
Evo-Devo enhances our understanding of the genetic and developmental underpinnings of evolutionary change, contributing to a more nuanced and accurate depiction of phylogenetic relationships.
9. Integrative Approaches to Phylogenetic Analysis
Integrative approaches to phylogenetic analysis involve combining multiple data types and methodologies to construct more comprehensive and accurate phylogenetic trees. By leveraging diverse sources of information, these approaches aim to overcome the limitations of single-method analyses and provide a more holistic view of evolutionary relationships.
Components of integrative phylogenetic analysis include:
- Multilocus Data: Incorporating genetic information from multiple genes or genomic regions to capture a broader spectrum of evolutionary signals.
- Morphological and Molecular Integration: Combining morphological traits with molecular data to enhance the robustness of phylogenetic inferences.
- Environmental and Ecological Data: Integrating information about species' habitats and ecological interactions to inform phylogenetic interpretations.
- Temporal Data: Utilizing fossil records and molecular clock estimates to incorporate temporal dimensions into phylogenetic trees.
Advantages of integrative approaches:
- Enhanced Accuracy: Combining multiple data sources reduces biases and errors associated with any single method.
- Comprehensive Insights: Integrating diverse information provides a more detailed and nuanced understanding of evolutionary relationships.
- Robustness Against Conflicting Signals: Multiple data types can help resolve conflicts and ambiguities present in individual datasets.
Challenges in integrative phylogenetic analysis include data compatibility, computational complexity, and the need for sophisticated statistical models to appropriately weigh and integrate disparate data sources. Despite these challenges, integrative approaches represent the future of phylogenetic research, driving advancements in our understanding of life's evolutionary tapestry.
10. Phylogenetic Diversity and Conservation Prioritization
Phylogenetic diversity (PD) measures the extent of evolutionary history represented by a set of species, capturing the diversity of lineages within a community or ecosystem. PD is a crucial metric in conservation biology, guiding the prioritization of areas and species for preservation based on their evolutionary significance.
Key aspects of phylogenetic diversity include:
- Branch Length: The total length of branches on a phylogenetic tree, representing the amount of evolutionary history.
- Egalitarian PD: Ensuring that all lineages are equally represented within a community, promoting balanced conservation efforts.
- Weighted PD: Assigning different weights to branches based on factors such as ecological importance or genetic distinctiveness.
Applications of phylogenetic diversity in conservation:
- Identifying Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs): Recognizing populations with distinct evolutionary histories to prioritize for conservation.
- Designing Protected Areas: Selecting regions that maximize phylogenetic diversity, ensuring the preservation of a wide range of evolutionary lineages.
- Evaluating Conservation Strategies: Assessing the effectiveness of conservation efforts in maintaining or enhancing phylogenetic diversity over time.
Benefits of using PD in conservation:
- Preservation of Evolutionary History: Protecting species that represent unique branches of the tree of life ensures the retention of diverse evolutionary narratives.
- Functional Diversity: Maintaining phylogenetic diversity often correlates with preserving functional diversity, enhancing ecosystem resilience and stability.
- Informed Decision-Making: PD provides a scientifically grounded basis for prioritizing conservation actions, optimizing resource allocation.
Integrating phylogenetic diversity into conservation planning fosters a more comprehensive and evolutionary-informed approach to preserving the planet's biological heritage.
Comparison Table
Aspect | Phylogeny | Taxonomy |
Definition | The evolutionary history and relationships among organisms. | The science of naming, defining, and classifying organisms. |
Focus | Evolutionary relationships and lineage diversification. | Organizational hierarchy and classification based on shared traits. |
Methodology | Phylogenetic trees, molecular data, cladistics. | Hierarchical classification, binomial nomenclature. |
Primary Tools | Molecular sequencing, computational algorithms. | Morphological analysis, taxonomic keys. |
Outcome | Understanding of evolutionary pathways and relationships. | Structured classification system for organizing biodiversity. |
Applications | Evolutionary biology, conservation genetics. | Biological identification, ecological studies. |
Summary and Key Takeaways
- Phylogeny explores evolutionary relationships, forming phylogenetic trees.
- Taxonomy classifies organisms into hierarchical categories based on shared traits.
- Molecular phylogenetics and cladistics enhance the accuracy of evolutionary studies.
- Integrative approaches and phylogenetic diversity are pivotal in modern conservation efforts.
- Understanding phylogeny and taxonomy is essential for comprehending biological diversity and evolution.
Coming Soon!
Tips
Mnemonic for Taxonomic Ranks: Dear King Philip Came Over For Good Soup helps remember Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species.
Use Visual Aids: Create and study phylogenetic trees to better understand evolutionary relationships.
Practice with Flashcards: Reinforce key concepts and definitions in phylogeny and taxonomy to enhance retention for exams.
Did You Know
1. The concept of a molecular clock was first proposed in the 1960s, revolutionizing how scientists estimate the timing of evolutionary events.
2. The discovery of the Loch Ness Monster prompted scientists to use phylogenetic methods to investigate its existence and possible evolutionary origins.
3. Integrative taxonomy has led to the identification of over 1,000 cryptic species, which are species that are genetically distinct but morphologically similar.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Confusing phylogeny with taxonomy.
Incorrect: Believing that taxonomy only deals with naming species without considering their evolutionary relationships.
Correct: Understanding that taxonomy organizes species based on shared traits and evolutionary history.
Mistake 2: Ignoring horizontal gene transfer in phylogenetic analyses.
Incorrect: Assuming all genetic similarities are due to common ancestry.
Correct: Considering horizontal gene transfer, especially in prokaryotes, to avoid inaccurate phylogenetic trees.